Can one desecrate Shabbat for a woman after childbirth and if so, how much after – 3 days? 7 days? 30 days? When is it considered the beginning of childbirth? The gemara discusses the danger of bloodletting and what one should do to prevent those potential dangers? Eating or drinking wine after was so important that Rav Nachman son of Yitzchak advised his student to engage in artifice in order to make sure one ate or drank. On what days of the week should one not bloodlet and what days of the month or on the calendar? what can be done with the umbilical cord and the placenta of Shabbat? What can be done to ensure the health of the newborn baby? This is derived from a verse describing the calamities that will befall the Jewish people in the days of destruction – what they will not be able to do then when a child is born is an indicator of what we are allowed to do even on Shabbat for a newborn.
Shabbat 129
Share this shiur:
Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:
Shabbat 129
״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״, בֵּין לֹא אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת.
I need Shabbat to be desecrated, or whether she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one does not desecrate Shabbat for her.
רַב אָשֵׁי מַתְנֵי הָכִי. מָר זוּטְרָא מַתְנֵי הָכִי: אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: חַיָּה כׇּל זְמַן שֶׁהַקֶּבֶר פָּתוּחַ, בֵּין אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״, וּבֵין אָמְרָה ״אֵין צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. נִסְתַּם הַקֶּבֶר, אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. לֹא אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת.
That is how Rav Ashi taught it. This is how Mar Zutra taught it: Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: With regard to a woman in childbirth, as long as the womb is open, whether she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, or whether she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one desecrates Shabbat for her. Once the womb closed after birth, if she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one desecrates Shabbat for her. If she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, and all the more so if she said: I do not need Shabbat to be desecrated, one does not desecrate Shabbat for her.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ רָבִינָא לְמָרִימָר: מָר זוּטְרָא מַתְנֵי לְקוּלָּא, וְרַב אָשֵׁי מַתְנֵי לְחוּמְרָא, הִלְכְתָא כְּמַאן? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: הֲלָכָה כְּמָר זוּטְרָא, סָפֵק נְפָשׁוֹת לְהָקֵל.
Ravina said to Mareimar: Since Mar Zutra teaches leniently, and Rav Ashi teaches stringently, in accordance with whose opinion is the halakha? Mareimar said to him: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Mar Zutra, based on the following principle: In cases of uncertainty concerning a life-threatening situation, the halakha is lenient.
מֵאֵימָתַי פְּתִיחַת הַקֶּבֶר? אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: מִשָּׁעָה שֶׁתֵּשֵׁב עַל הַמַּשְׁבֵּר. רַב הוּנָא בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַב יְהוֹשֻׁעַ אָמַר: מִשָּׁעָה שֶׁהַדָּם שׁוֹתֵת וְיוֹרֵד, וְאָמְרִי לַהּ מִשָּׁעָה שֶׁחַבְרוֹתֶיהָ נוֹשְׂאוֹת אוֹתָהּ בַּאֲגַפֶּיהָ.
With regard to the matter of the open womb, the Gemara asks: From when is it considered that the opening of the womb has begun? Abaye says: It begins from when the woman sits on the travailing chair. Rav Huna, son of Rav Yehoshua, said: It begins from when the blood flows and descends; and others say when her friends need to carry her by her arms, as she can no longer walk on her own.
עַד מָתַי פְּתִיחַת הַקֶּבֶר? אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: שְׁלֹשָׁה יָמִים. רָבָא אָמַר מִשְּׁמֵיהּ דְּרַב יְהוּדָה: שִׁבְעָה, וְאָמְרִי לַהּ: שְׁלֹשִׁים.
The Gemara asks: Until when does the opening of the womb continue? Abaye said: It lasts three days. Rava said in the name of Rav Yehuda: It lasts seven days. And others say: It lasts thirty days.
אָמְרִי נְהַרְדָּעֵי: חַיָּה שְׁלֹשָׁה שִׁבְעָה וּשְׁלֹשִׁים. שְׁלֹשָׁה, בֵּין אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״, וּבֵין אָמְרָה ״לֹא צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. שִׁבְעָה, אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת, אָמְרָה ״לֹא צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. שְׁלֹשִׁים, אֲפִילּוּ אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת, אֲבָל עוֹשִׂין עַל יְדֵי אַרְמַאי.
The Sages of Neharde’a say: For a woman in childbirth, there are halakhic distinctions between three, seven, and thirty days after she gives birth. The Gemara elaborates: During the first three days after birth, whether she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, or whether she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one desecrates Shabbat for her. Between three and seven days after birth, if she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one desecrates Shabbat for her. If she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one does not desecrate Shabbat for her. Between seven and thirty days after birth, even if she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one does not desecrate Shabbat for her; however, we perform all necessary prohibited labors by means of a gentile.
כִּדְרַב עוּלָּא בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַב עִילַּאי, דְּאָמַר: כׇּל צׇרְכֵי חוֹלֶה נַעֲשִׂין עַל יְדֵי אַרְמַאי בְּשַׁבָּת, וְכִדְרַב הַמְנוּנָא, דְּאָמַר רַב הַמְנוּנָא: דָּבָר שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ סַכָּנָה — אוֹמֵר לְגוֹי וְעוֹשֶׂה.
This ruling is in accordance with the statement of Rav Ulla, son of Rav Ilai, who said: All needs of a sick person whose life is not in danger are performed by means of a gentile on Shabbat. And this ruling is in accordance with the opinion of Rav Hamnuna, as Rav Hamnuna says: With regard to a matter in which there is no danger, but only potential illness, one says to the gentile to perform the act, and the gentile performs the act.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: לְחַיָּה שְׁלֹשִׁים יוֹם. לְמַאי הִלְכְתָא? אָמְרִי נְהַרְדָּעֵי: לִטְבִילָה.
Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: For a woman in childbirth, there is a halakha of thirty days. The Gemara asks: With regard to what halakha was this stated? The Sages of Neharde’a say: It was stated with regard to the halakha of immersion. A woman does not purify herself through ritual immersion within thirty days of giving birth because she is in a weakened state and susceptible to catching cold.
אָמַר רָבָא: לָא אֲמַרַן אֶלָּא שֶׁאֵין בַּעְלָהּ עִמָּהּ, אֲבָל בַּעְלָהּ עִמָּהּ — בַּעְלָהּ מְחַמְּמָה. כִּי הָא דִּבְרַתֵּיה דְּרַב חִסְדָּא טְבַלָה בְּגוֹ תְּלָתִין יוֹמִין שֶׁלֹּא בִּפְנֵי בַּעְלָהּ וְאִצְטְנִיאַת, וְאַמְטְיוּהָא לְעַרְסַהּ בָּתְרֵיהּ דְּרָבָא לְפוּמְבְּדִיתָא.
Rava said: We say that the ruling that she does not immerse during that period applies only when her husband is not with her. However, if her husband is with her, her husband warms her by engaging in relations with her, and she is not susceptible to catching cold, as is illustrated in this incident involving the daughter of Rav Ḥisda, Rava’s wife. She immersed within thirty days of giving birth, not in the presence of her husband, and caught cold, and afterward they brought her funeral bier after Rava to Pumbedita.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: עוֹשִׂין מְדוּרָה לְחַיָּה בְּשַׁבָּת בִּימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים. סְבוּר מִינָּה לְחַיָּה — אִין, לַחוֹלֶה — לָא, בִּימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים — אִין, בִּימוֹת הַחַמָּה — לָא. וְלָא הִיא, לָא שְׁנָא חַיָּה וְלָא שְׁנָא חוֹלֶה, לָא שְׁנָא בִּימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים וְלָא שְׁנָא בִּימוֹת הַחַמָּה. מִדְּאִתְּמַר, אָמַר רַב חִיָּיא בַּר אָבִין אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: הִקִּיז דָּם וְנִצְטַנֵּן — עוֹשִׂין לוֹ מְדוּרָה אֲפִילּוּ בִּתְקוּפַת תַּמּוּז.
Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: One builds a fire for a woman in childbirth on Shabbat during the rainy season. The Sages thought to infer from here the following: For a woman in childbirth, yes, one builds a fire; for sick people, no, he does not build a fire. In the rainy season, yes, one builds a fire; in the summer, no, he does not build a fire. And the Gemara concludes: That is not the case. There is no difference between a woman in childbirth and a sick person, and there is no difference between the rainy season and the summer. In all of these cases one may build a fire on Shabbat. This conclusion emerges from that which was stated: Rav Ḥiyya bar Avin said that Shmuel said: With regard to one who let blood and caught cold, one makes a fire for him even during the season of Tammuz, i.e., the summer. Failure to do so could result in serious illness.
שְׁמוּאֵל צַלַּחוּ לֵיהּ תַּכְתָּקָא דְשָׁאגָא, רַב יְהוּדָה צַלַּחוּ לֵיהּ פָּתוּרָא דְיוֹנָה, לְרַבָּה צַלַּחוּ לֵיהּ שַׁרְשִׁיפָא.
The Gemara relates that after Shmuel underwent bloodletting, they broke for him a wooden armchair made of teak [shaga] to build a fire. Similarly, for the sake of Rav Yehuda they broke a wooden table made of ebony [yavna], and for Rabba they broke a bench. They needed to build a fire due to the potential danger to Rabba. Since they could not find firewood, they kindled the fire with the furniture.
וַאֲמַר לֵיהּ אַבָּיֵי לְרַבָּה: וְהָא קָעָבַר מָר מִשּׁוּם ״בַּל תַּשְׁחִית״! אֲמַר לֵיהּ: ״בַּל תַּשְׁחִית״ דְּגוּפַאי עֲדִיף לִי.
And Abaye said to Rabba: In breaking the bench, didn’t the Master violate the prohibition, “Do not destroy” (Deuteronomy 20:19)? It is prohibited to destroy objects of value. Rabba said to him: Do not destroy also with regard to destruction of my body. Preventing illness and danger is preferable to me.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: לְעוֹלָם יִמְכּוֹר אָדָם קוֹרוֹת בֵּיתוֹ וְיִקַּח מִנְעָלִים לְרַגְלָיו. הִקִּיז דָּם וְאֵין לוֹ מַה יֹּאכַל — יִמְכּוֹר מִנְעָלִים שֶׁבְּרַגְלָיו וְיַסְפִּיק מֵהֶן צׇרְכֵי סְעוּדָה.
With regard to the danger of bloodletting, the Gemara cites that which Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: One should always sell the beams of his house and purchase shoes for his feet with the proceeds, as shoes protect him from stepping on obstacles and from catching cold. If he let blood and has nothing to eat after the bloodletting, he should even sell the shoes on his feet, and from the proceeds provide the needs of a meal. After bloodletting, a meal is more crucial to one’s well-being than shoes are.
מַאי צׇרְכֵי סְעוּדָה? רַב אָמַר: בָּשָׂר, וּשְׁמוּאֵל אָמַר: יַיִן. רַב אָמַר: בָּשָׂר — נַפְשָׁא חֲלַף נַפְשָׁא. וּשְׁמוּאֵל אָמַר: יַיִן — סוּמָּקָא חֲלַף סוּמָּקָא.
The Gemara asks: What are these special needs of a meal? Rav said: It is referring to meat. And Shmuel said: It is referring to wine. The Gemara explains: Rav says: It is referring to meat because the soul replaces the soul, i.e., the meat replenishes the person’s strength. And Shmuel said: It is referring to wine because the red replaces the red, i.e., red wine substitutes for red blood.
(סִימָן ״שֶׁנִּמְסַר״).
A mnemonic for the names of the Sages cited in the following discussion is the word shenimsar; shin for Shmuel, nun for Rabbi Yoḥanan, mem for Rav Naḥman, samekh for Rav Yosef, reish for Rava.
שְׁמוּאֵל בְּיוֹמָא דַּעֲבַד מִילְּתָא, עָבְדִי לֵיהּ תַּבְשִׁילָא דִטְחָלֵי. רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן שָׁתֵי עַד דְּנָפֵיק תִּיהְיָא מֵאוּנֵּיהּ. וְרַב נַחְמָן שָׁתֵי עַד דְּקָפֵי טְחָלֵיהּ. רַב יוֹסֵף שָׁתֵי עַד דְּנָפֵיק מֵרִיבְדָּא דְכוּסִילְתָּא. רָבָא מְהַדַּר אַחַמְרָא בַּר תְּלָתָא טַרְפֵי.
The Gemara relates the following about bloodletting and drinking wine. Shmuel, on the day on which he would perform the practice of bloodletting, they would prepare for him a dish of cooked spleen. Rabbi Yoḥanan would drink wine after bloodletting until the odor emerged from his ears. And Rav Naḥman would drink until his spleen floated in wine. Rav Yosef would drink until the wine would emerge from the bloodletting incision. Rava would search for wine that was sufficiently aged such that three leaves had already grown over three years on the vine from which the grapes were picked (Rashash).
אֲמַר לְהוּ רַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק לְרַבָּנַן: בְּמָטוּתָא מִינַּיְיכוּ, בְּיוֹמָא דְהַקָּזָה אֱמַרוּ לְבֵיתַיְיכוּ: נַחְמָן אִקְּלַע לְגַבַּן.
Rav Naḥman bar Yitzhak said to the Sages: I beg of you, on the day that you undergo bloodletting, tell your households, your wives: Naḥman bar Yitzhak happened to come to visit us. Due to the visit of the important guest, the women will prepare a large meal. The husbands will eat well, recover from the lost blood, and avoid endangering themselves.
וְכוּלְּהוּ אִעָרוֹמֵי אֲסִירִי, בַּר מֵהַאי עׇרְמָה דִּשְׁרֵי: מַאן דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא וְלָא אֶפְשָׁר לֵיהּ, לִישְׁקוֹל זוּזָא מָכָא וְלֵיזִיל לְשַׁב חַנְוָאתָא, עַד דְּטָעֵים שִׁיעוּר רְבִיעֲתָא. וְאִי לָא — לֵיכוֹל שַׁב תַּמְרֵי אוּכָּמָתָא, וְלֵישׁוּף מִישְׁחָא בְּצִידְעֵיהּ, וְנִיגְנֵי בְּשִׁמְשָׁא.
And Rav Naḥman bar Yitzhak said: All types of artifice that come at the expense of others are prohibited except for this artifice, which is permitted. One who performed the practice of bloodletting and it is not possible for him to purchase food due to lack of means, let him take a worn zuz coin and go to seven stores. In each store, he tastes the wine as one who seeks to buy wine would. After tasting, he hands the zuz to the storekeeper, who will not accept it because it is worn. He then proceeds to do the same in all the stores until he has tasted the measure of a quarter of a log of wine. And if doing so is not possible, let him eat seven black dates and smear oil on his temple and lie in the sun.
אַבְלֵט אַשְׁכְּחֵיהּ לִשְׁמוּאֵל דְּגָנֵי בְּשִׁמְשָׁא. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: חַכִּימָא דִיהוּדָאֵי, בִּישָׁא מִי הָוֵי טָבָא?! אֲמַר לֵיהּ: יוֹמָא דְהַקָּזָה הוּא.
The Gemara relates: The gentile scholar, Ablat, found Shmuel lying in the sun. Ablat said to Shmuel: Wise man of the Jews, a matter that is evil, can it become good? Are there any circumstances in which the heat of the sun, which is harmful, can be beneficial? Shmuel said to him: It happens on a day of bloodletting, for which the heat of the sun is beneficial.
וְלָא הִיא, אֶלָּא אִיכָּא יוֹמָא דִּמְעַלֵּי בֵּהּ שִׁמְשָׁא בְּכוּלַּהּ שַׁתָּא — יוֹמָא דְּנָפְלָה בֵּיהּ תְּקוּפַת תַּמּוּז. וְסָבַר: לָא אֱיגַלֵּי לֵיהּ.
The Gemara comments: And actually, that is not what occurred. Rather, there is a day on which the sun is beneficial more than the entire year, and that is the day on which the Tammuz solstice, the longest day of the year, occurs. And Shmuel thought: I will not reveal this remedy to him.
(הֵיקֵיל בְּרוּחַ טַעְמָא שָׁהָה — סִימָן) רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: כׇּל הַמַּקֵּיל בִּסְעוּדַת הַקָּזַת דָּם — מְקִילִּין לוֹ מְזוֹנוֹתָיו מִן הַשָּׁמַיִם, וְאוֹמְרִים: הוּא עַל חַיָּיו לֹא חָס, אֲנִי אָחוּס עָלָיו?!
Indifferent, in wind, taste, waited are a mnemonic for the following matters. It was Rav and Shmuel who both said: Anyone who is indifferent and not vigilant with regard to the meal eaten after bloodletting, they are indifferent with regard to providing his food from the Heavens. And they say in the name of Heaven: He took no pity on his life, will I take pity on him?
רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: הַאי מַאן דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא — לָא לִיתִּיב הֵיכָא דִּכְרִיךְ זִיקָא, דִּילְמָא שָׁפֵי לֵיהּ אוּמָּנָא וּמוֹקֵים לֵיהּ אַרְבִיעֵתָא, וְאָתֵי זִיקָא וְשָׁאֵיף מִינֵּיהּ, וְאָתֵי לִידֵי סַכָּנָה.
Similarly, it was Rav and Shmuel who both said: One who performs the practice of bloodletting should not sit where the wind is blowing, due to the concern that perhaps the blood letter let too much blood from him and established the amount of remaining blood at a quarter of a log. And there is concern the wind will come and draw out a little more blood from him, and he will be endangered.
שְׁמוּאֵל הֲוָה רְגִיל דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא בְּבֵיתָא דְּשַׁב לִבְנֵי וְאַרְחָא. יוֹמָא חֲדָא עֲבַד, וְאַרְגִּישׁ בְּנַפְשֵׁיהּ. בְּדַק וַחֲסַר חַד אַרְחָא.
The Gemara relates: Shmuel would customarily perform the practice of bloodletting in a house whose walls were seven and a half bricks thick. One day he performed bloodletting and felt himself weakened. He examined and discovered that one half-brick was lacking from the thickness of the walls. The resultant chill caused his weakness.
רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: הַאי מַאן דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא — לִיטְעוֹם מִידֵּי וַהֲדַר לִיפּוֹק. דְּאִי לָא טָעֵים מִידֵּי, אִי פָּגַע בְּשָׁכְבָא — יָרְקִי אַפֵּיהּ. אִי פָּגַע בְּמַאן דְּקָטֵל נַפְשָׁא — מָיֵת. אִי פָּגַע
It was Rav and Shmuel who both said: One who performs the practice of bloodletting should taste something and then go outside, since if he does not taste anything, if he encounters a corpse, his face will turn green. If he encounters one who killed a person, he will die. If he encounters
בְּדָבָר אַחֵר — קָשֶׁה לְדָבָר אַחֵר.
something else, a euphemism for a pig, it is harmful with regard to something else, a euphemism for leprosy.
רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: הַאי מַאן דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא — לִישְׁהֵי פּוּרְתָּא וַהֲדַר לֵיקוּם — דְּאָמַר מָר: חֲמִשָּׁה דְּבָרִים קְרוֹבִין לְמִיתָה יוֹתֵר מִן הַחַיִּים, וְאֵלּוּ הֵן: אָכַל וְעָמַד, שָׁתָה וְעָמַד, יָשֵׁן וְעָמַד, הִקִּיז דָּם וְעָמַד, שִׁימֵּשׁ מִטָּתוֹ וְעָמַד.
It was Rav and Shmuel who both said: With regard to one who performs the practice of bloodletting, let him wait a bit and then let him rise, as the Master said: There are five matters that render one closer to death than life, and they are these: If one ate and immediately rose, if one drank and rose, if one slept and immediately rose, if one let blood and rose, if one engaged in conjugal relations and rose.
אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: פּוּרְסָא דִדְמָא — כׇּל תְּלָתִין יוֹמִין. וּבֵין הַפְּרָקִים — יְמַעֵט, וּבֵין הַפְּרָקִים יַחְזוֹר וִימַעֵט.
Shmuel said: The interval for bloodletting is every thirty days. And during the middle periods of one’s life, he should decrease the frequency of bloodletting; and during the later periods, he should decrease its frequency again.
וְאָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: פּוּרְסָא דִדְמָא — חַד בְּשַׁבְּתָא, אַרְבָּעָה, וּמַעֲלֵי שַׁבְּתָא, אֲבָל שֵׁנִי וַחֲמִישִׁי — לָא. דְּאָמַר מָר: מִי שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ זְכוּת אָבוֹת יַקִּיז דָּם בְּשֵׁנִי וּבַחֲמִישִׁי, שֶׁבֵּית דִּין שֶׁל מַעְלָה וְשֶׁל מַטָּה שָׁוִין כְּאֶחָד.
And Shmuel said: The times for bloodletting are the first day of the week, the fourth day of the week and Shabbat eve. However, on the second and the fifth days of the week, no, one should not let blood, as the Master said: Only one who has the merit of his ancestors and relies on it should let blood on the second and on the fifth days of the week, as the court on High, in the heavens, and the court below are equal. The courts in the cities convene on Mondays and Thursdays, as does the heavenly court. Letting blood on a day of judgment is dangerous. If one is judged unfavorably all his blood could flow out.
בִּתְלָתָא בְּשַׁבְּתָא מַאי טַעְמָא לָא? מִשּׁוּם דְּקָיְימָא לֵיהּ מַאְדִּים בְּזָוֵוי. מַעֲלֵי שַׁבְּתָא נָמֵי קָיְימָא בְּזָוֵוי! כֵּיוָן דְּדָשׁוּ בֵּיהּ רַבִּים — ״שׁוֹמֵר פְּתָאִים ה׳״.
The Gemara explains: On the third day of the week, what is the reason that one does not let blood? It is because the planet Mars is dominant during the even hours. Since it is a planet of blood, and the even hours are a bad omen, that combination gives cause for concern. The Gemara asks: On Shabbat eve, Mars also dominates during the even hours. The Gemara answers: Since the multitudes have already become accustomed to letting blood on Shabbat eve, the verse: “The Lord protects the simple-hearted” (Psalms 116:6) applies in this case.
אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אַרְבַּע דְּהוּא אַרְבַּע, אַרְבַּע דְּהוּא אַרְבֵּיסַר, אַרְבַּע דְּהוּא עֶשְׂרִים וְאַרְבְּעָה, אַרְבַּע דְּלֵיכָּא אַרְבַּע בָּתְרֵיהּ — סַכַּנְתָּא.
Similarly, Shmuel says: On the fourth day of the week that is the fourth day of the month; on the fourth day of the week that is the fourteenth of the month; on the fourth day of the week that is the twenty-fourth of the month; and on the fourth day of the week after which there are not four days remaining in the month it is dangerous to let blood.
רֹאשׁ חוֹדֶשׁ וְשֵׁנִי לוֹ — חוּלְשָׁא. שְׁלִישִׁי לוֹ — סַכָּנָה. מַעֲלֵי יוֹמָא טָבָא — חוּלְשָׁא. מַעֲלֵי יוֹמָא דַעֲצַרְתָּא — סַכַּנְתָּא. וּגְזַרוּ רַבָּנַן אַכּוּלְּהוּ מַעֲלֵי יוֹמָא טָבָא מִשּׁוּם יוֹמָא (טָבָא) דַעֲצַרְתָּא, דְּנָפֵיק בֵּיהּ זִיקָא וּשְׁמֵיהּ ״טָבוֹחַ״, דְּאִי לָא קַבִּלוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל תּוֹרָה — הֲוָה טָבַח לְהוּ לְבִשְׂרַיְיהוּ וְלִדְמַיְיהוּ.
Bloodletting on the New Moon and on the second day of the month causes weakness; bloodletting on the third day of the month leads to danger. Bloodletting on the eve of a Festival causes weakness; bloodletting on the eve of the festival of Shavuot leads to danger. And the Sages issued a decree prohibiting bloodletting on the eve of every Festival due to the festival of Shavuot. On Shavuot, an evil spirit named Tibbuaḥ, from the Hebrew word meaning slaughter, emerges, as had the Jewish people not accepted the Torah on the festival of Shavuot, Tibbuaḥ would have slaughtered their flesh and their blood. Consequently, it remains a dangerous day.
אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אָכַל חִטָּה וְהִקִּיז דָּם — לֹא הִקִּיז אֶלָּא לְאוֹתָהּ חִטָּה. וְהָנֵי מִילֵּי לִרְפוּאָה, אֲבָל אַקּוֹלֵי — מֵיקֵיל.
Shmuel said: If one ate wheat and afterward let blood, he only let that wheat. The bloodletting was ineffective as the wheat replaced any blood that was let. And this ineffectiveness applies only if he let blood to cure an illness; however, to relieve discomfort, bloodletting after eating wheat relieves one’s discomfort.
הַמַּקִּיז דָּם, שְׁתִיָּיה — לְאַלְתַּר. אֲכִילָה — עַד חֲצִי מִיל.
One who lets blood should engage in drinking immediately; he should not engage in eating until the time that it takes to walk half a mil has elapsed.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: שְׁתִיָּיה לְאַלְתַּר מְעַלֵּי, אֲבָל בָּתַר הָכִי קָשֵׁי, אוֹ דִילְמָא לָא קָשֵׁי וְלָא מְעַלֵּי? תֵּיקוּ.
A dilemma was raised before the Sages: When they said that one should engage in drinking immediately, does that mean that drinking immediately is beneficial; however, thereafter, it is injurious? Or perhaps, thereafter it is neither injurious nor beneficial. No resolution is found for this dilemma, therefore it stands unresolved.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: אֲכִילָה עַד חֲצִי מִיל הוּא דְּקָמְעַלֵּי, הָא בָּתַר הָכִי וּמִקַּמֵּי הָכִי — קָשֵׁי, אוֹ דִילְמָא לָא קָשֵׁי וְלָא מְעַלֵּי? תֵּיקוּ.
Similarly, a dilemma was raised before the Sages: When they said one should not engage in eating until the time that it takes to walk half a mil has elapsed, does that mean that only at that time it is beneficial, however, after that time or before that time it is injurious? Or perhaps, before and after that time it is neither injurious nor beneficial. No resolution is found for this dilemma, therefore it too stands unresolved.
מַכְרִיז רַב: מֵאָה קַרֵי בְּזוּזָא, מֵאָה רֵישֵׁי בְּזוּזָא, מֵאָה שְׂפָמֵי וְלָא כְלוּם. אָמַר רַב יוֹסֵף: כִּי הֲוֵינַן בֵּי רַב הוּנָא, יוֹמָא דִּמְפַגְּרִי בֵּיהּ רַבָּנַן, אָמְרִי: הָאִידָּנָא יוֹמָא דִשְׂפָמֵי הוּא, וְלָא יָדַעְנָא מַאי קָאָמְרִי.
Rav would announce: One hundred bloodlettings for a zuz; cutting the hair on one hundred heads for a zuz; grooming one hundred moustaches does not cost anything (ge’onim). Blood letters typically served as barbers as well and did not charge for grooming a moustache. If one hundred men happened to arrive one day to have their moustaches groomed, the barber would work all day without receiving any pay. Rav Yosef said: When we were students in Rav Huna’s school, on a day when the Sages were sluggish in their studies, they would say: Today is the day of the moustaches, and I did not know what they were saying. Now that I heard Rav’s statement, I understand that they meant that it was a day without purpose.
וְקוֹשְׁרִין הַטַּבּוּר. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: קוֹשְׁרִין הַטַּבּוּר. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר: אַף חוֹתְכִין. וְטוֹמְנִין הַשִּׁלְיָא כְּדֵי שֶׁיֵּחַם הַוָּלָד. אָמַר רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל: בְּנוֹת מְלָכִים — טוֹמְנוֹת בִּסְפָלִים שֶׁל שֶׁמֶן, בְּנוֹת עֲשִׁירִים — בִּסְפוֹגִים שֶׁל צֶמֶר, בְּנוֹת עֲנִיִּים בְּמוֹכִין.
We learned in the mishna: And one may tie the umbilical cord of a child born on Shabbat. The Sages taught similarly in the Tosefta and even added to it: One may tie the umbilical cord of a child born on Shabbat. Rabbi Yosei said: One may even cut the umbilical cord. And one may insulate the placenta as a healing remedy so as to warm the newborn. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel said: Princesses insulate the placenta in mugs of oil; the daughters of the wealthy do so in combed wool; the daughters of the poor in soft rags.
אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר אֲבוּהּ אָמַר רַב: הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יוֹסֵי.
Rav Naḥman said that Rabba bar Avuh said that Rav said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yosei that it is even permitted to cut the umbilical cord on Shabbat.
וְאָמַר רַב נַחְמָן אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר אֲבוּהּ אָמַר רַב: מוֹדִים חֲכָמִים לְרַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּטַבּוּר שֶׁל שְׁנֵי תִינוֹקוֹת, שֶׁחוֹתְכִין. מַאי טַעְמָא? דִּמְנַתְּחִי אַהֲדָדֵי.
And Rav Naḥman said that Rabba bar Avuh said that Rav said: The Rabbis concede to Rabbi Yosei with regard to the umbilical cord attached to twin babies that one may cut it on Shabbat. What is the reason for this? In that case, leaving the cord attached is dangerous. Since the attached twins will try to disengage from each other, they could potentially rip each other’s cords.
וְאָמַר רַב נַחְמָן אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר אֲבוּהּ אָמַר רַב: כׇּל הָאָמוּר בְּפָרָשַׁת תּוֹכָחָה עוֹשִׂין לְחַיָּה בְּשַׁבָּת. שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וּמוֹלְדוֹתַיִךְ בְּיוֹם הוּלֶּדֶת אוֹתָךְ לֹא כׇרַּת שׇׁרֵּךְ וּבְמַיִם לֹא רֻחַצְתְּ לְמִשְׁעִי וְהׇמְלֵחַ לֹא הֻמְלַחַתְּ וְהׇחְתֵּל לֹא חֻתָּלְתְּ״.
And Rav Naḥman said that Rabba bar Avuh said that Rav said: Everything stated in the passage of rebuke (Ezekiel 16) one may perform for a woman in childbirth on Shabbat. Since that chapter speaks of the dangerous birth of an abandoned child, for all other children, these issues should be addressed. As it is stated there: “And as for your birth, on the day you were born, your navel was not cut, and you were not washed in water for cleansing, and you were not salted, nor were you swaddled” (Ezekiel 16:4).
״וּמוֹלְדוֹתַיִךְ בְּיוֹם הוּלֶּדֶת״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁמְיַילְּדִים אֶת הַוָּלָד בְּשַׁבָּת. ״לֹא כׇרַּת שׇׁרֵּךְ״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁחוֹתְכִין הַטַּבּוּר בְּשַׁבָּת. ״וּבְמַיִם לֹא רֻחַצְתְּ לְמִשְׁעִי״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁרוֹחֲצִין הַוָּלָד בְּשַׁבָּת. ״וְהׇמְלֵחַ לֹא הֻמְלַחַתְּ״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁמּוֹלְחִין הַוָּלָד בְּשַׁבָּת. ״וְהׇחְתֵּל לֹא חֻתָּלְתְּ״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁמְּלַפְּפִין הַוָּלָד בְּשַׁבָּת.
The Gemara explains: “And as for your birth, on the day you were born”; from here it is derived that one delivers the newborn on Shabbat. “Your navel was not cut”; from here it is derived that one cuts the umbilical cord on Shabbat. “And you were not washed in water for cleansing”; from here it is derived that one washes the newborn on Shabbat. “And you were not salted”; from here it is derived that one salts the newborn on Shabbat. “Nor were you swaddled”; from here it is derived that one swaddles the newborn on Shabbat.
הדרן עלך מפנין
New to Talmud?
Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you.
The Hadran Women’s Tapestry
Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories.
Blacksburg, United States
When I started studying Hebrew at Brown University’s Hillel, I had no idea that almost 38 years later, I’m doing Daf Yomi. My Shabbat haburah is led by Rabbanit Leah Sarna. The women are a hoot. I’m tracking the completion of each tractate by reading Ilana Kurshan’s memoir, If All the Seas Were Ink.
Pennsylvania, United States
I started the daf at the beginning of this cycle in January 2020. My husband, my children, grandchildren and siblings have been very supportive. As someone who learned and taught Tanach and mefarshim for many years, it has been an amazing adventure to complete the six sedarim of Mishnah, and now to study Talmud on a daily basis along with Rabbanit Michelle and the wonderful women of Hadran.
Jerusalem, Israel
Jerusalem, Israel
When I began learning Daf Yomi at the beginning of the current cycle, I was preparing for an upcoming surgery and thought that learning the Daf would be something positive I could do each day during my recovery, even if I accomplished nothing else. I had no idea what a lifeline learning the Daf would turn out to be in so many ways.
Lexington, MA, United States
It’s hard to believe it has been over two years. Daf yomi has changed my life in so many ways and has been sustaining during this global sea change. Each day means learning something new, digging a little deeper, adding another lens, seeing worlds with new eyes. Daf has also fostered new friendships and deepened childhood connections, as long time friends have unexpectedly become havruta.
Northwest Washington, United States
In January 2020, my chevruta suggested that we “up our game. Let’s do Daf Yomi” – and she sent me the Hadran link. I lost my job (and went freelance), there was a pandemic, and I am still opening the podcast with my breakfast coffee, or after Shabbat with popcorn. My Aramaic is improving. I will need a new bookcase, though.
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Since I started in January of 2020, Daf Yomi has changed my life. It connects me to Jews all over the world, especially learned women. It makes cooking, gardening, and folding laundry into acts of Torah study. Daf Yomi enables me to participate in a conversation with and about our heritage that has been going on for more than 2000 years.
Skokie, IL, United States
I started learning Gemara at the Yeshivah of Flatbush. And I resumed ‘ברוך ה decades later with Rabbanit Michele at Hadran. I started from Brachot and have had an exciting, rewarding experience throughout seder Moed!
Maale Adumim, Israel
Shortly after the death of my father, David Malik z”l, I made the commitment to Daf Yomi. While riding to Ben Gurion airport in January, Siyum HaShas was playing on the radio; that was the nudge I needed to get started. The “everyday-ness” of the Daf has been a meaningful spiritual practice, especial after COVID began & I was temporarily unable to say Kaddish at daily in-person minyanim.
Wynnewood, United States
Geri Goldstein got me started learning daf yomi when I was in Israel 2 years ago. It’s been a challenge and I’ve learned a lot though I’m sure I miss a lot. I quilt as I listen and I want to share what I’ve been working on.
Ottawa, Canada
Richmond, CA, United States
It happened without intent (so am I yotzei?!) – I watched the women’s siyum live and was so moved by it that the next morning, I tuned in to Rabbanit Michelle’s shiur, and here I am, still learning every day, over 2 years later. Some days it all goes over my head, but others I grasp onto an idea or a story, and I ‘get it’ and that’s the best feeling in the world. So proud to be a Hadran learner.
Zichron Yaakov, Israel
A Gemara shiur previous to the Hadran Siyum, was the impetus to attend it.It was highly inspirational and I was smitten. The message for me was התלמוד בידינו. I had decided along with my Chahsmonaim group to to do the daf and take it one daf at time- without any expectations at all. There has been a wealth of information, insights and halachik ideas. It is truly exercise of the mind, heart & Soul
Hashmonaim, Israel
I tried Daf Yomi in the middle of the last cycle after realizing I could listen to Michelle’s shiurim online. It lasted all of 2 days! Then the new cycle started just days before my father’s first yahrzeit and my youngest daughter’s bat mitzvah. It seemed the right time for a new beginning. My family, friends, colleagues are immensely supportive!
Zichron Yaakov, Israel
Los Angeles, United States
My husband learns Daf, my son learns Daf, my son-in-law learns Daf.
When I read about Hadran’s Siyyum HaShas 2 years ago, I thought- I can learn Daf too!
I had learned Gemara in Hillel HS in NJ, & I remembered loving it.
Rabbanit Michelle & Hadran have opened my eyes & expanding my learning so much in the past few years. We can now discuss Gemara as a family.
This was a life saver during Covid
Brooklyn, NY, United States
I began my journey two years ago at the beginning of this cycle of the daf yomi. It has been an incredible, challenging experience and has given me a new perspective of Torah Sh’baal Peh and the role it plays in our lives
Efrat, Israel
I started the daf at the beginning of this cycle in January 2020. My husband, my children, grandchildren and siblings have been very supportive. As someone who learned and taught Tanach and mefarshim for many years, it has been an amazing adventure to complete the six sedarim of Mishnah, and now to study Talmud on a daily basis along with Rabbanit Michelle and the wonderful women of Hadran.
Jerusalem, Israel
After experiences over the years of asking to join gemara shiurim for men and either being refused by the maggid shiur or being the only women there, sometimes behind a mechitza, I found out about Hadran sometime during the tail end of Masechet Shabbat, I think. Life has been much better since then.
London, United Kingdom
Shabbat 129
״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״, בֵּין לֹא אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת.
I need Shabbat to be desecrated, or whether she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one does not desecrate Shabbat for her.
רַב אָשֵׁי מַתְנֵי הָכִי. מָר זוּטְרָא מַתְנֵי הָכִי: אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: חַיָּה כׇּל זְמַן שֶׁהַקֶּבֶר פָּתוּחַ, בֵּין אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״, וּבֵין אָמְרָה ״אֵין צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. נִסְתַּם הַקֶּבֶר, אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. לֹא אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת.
That is how Rav Ashi taught it. This is how Mar Zutra taught it: Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: With regard to a woman in childbirth, as long as the womb is open, whether she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, or whether she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one desecrates Shabbat for her. Once the womb closed after birth, if she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one desecrates Shabbat for her. If she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, and all the more so if she said: I do not need Shabbat to be desecrated, one does not desecrate Shabbat for her.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ רָבִינָא לְמָרִימָר: מָר זוּטְרָא מַתְנֵי לְקוּלָּא, וְרַב אָשֵׁי מַתְנֵי לְחוּמְרָא, הִלְכְתָא כְּמַאן? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: הֲלָכָה כְּמָר זוּטְרָא, סָפֵק נְפָשׁוֹת לְהָקֵל.
Ravina said to Mareimar: Since Mar Zutra teaches leniently, and Rav Ashi teaches stringently, in accordance with whose opinion is the halakha? Mareimar said to him: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Mar Zutra, based on the following principle: In cases of uncertainty concerning a life-threatening situation, the halakha is lenient.
מֵאֵימָתַי פְּתִיחַת הַקֶּבֶר? אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: מִשָּׁעָה שֶׁתֵּשֵׁב עַל הַמַּשְׁבֵּר. רַב הוּנָא בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַב יְהוֹשֻׁעַ אָמַר: מִשָּׁעָה שֶׁהַדָּם שׁוֹתֵת וְיוֹרֵד, וְאָמְרִי לַהּ מִשָּׁעָה שֶׁחַבְרוֹתֶיהָ נוֹשְׂאוֹת אוֹתָהּ בַּאֲגַפֶּיהָ.
With regard to the matter of the open womb, the Gemara asks: From when is it considered that the opening of the womb has begun? Abaye says: It begins from when the woman sits on the travailing chair. Rav Huna, son of Rav Yehoshua, said: It begins from when the blood flows and descends; and others say when her friends need to carry her by her arms, as she can no longer walk on her own.
עַד מָתַי פְּתִיחַת הַקֶּבֶר? אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: שְׁלֹשָׁה יָמִים. רָבָא אָמַר מִשְּׁמֵיהּ דְּרַב יְהוּדָה: שִׁבְעָה, וְאָמְרִי לַהּ: שְׁלֹשִׁים.
The Gemara asks: Until when does the opening of the womb continue? Abaye said: It lasts three days. Rava said in the name of Rav Yehuda: It lasts seven days. And others say: It lasts thirty days.
אָמְרִי נְהַרְדָּעֵי: חַיָּה שְׁלֹשָׁה שִׁבְעָה וּשְׁלֹשִׁים. שְׁלֹשָׁה, בֵּין אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״, וּבֵין אָמְרָה ״לֹא צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. שִׁבְעָה, אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת, אָמְרָה ״לֹא צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. שְׁלֹשִׁים, אֲפִילּוּ אָמְרָה ״צְרִיכָה אֲנִי״ — אֵין מְחַלְּלִין עָלֶיהָ אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת, אֲבָל עוֹשִׂין עַל יְדֵי אַרְמַאי.
The Sages of Neharde’a say: For a woman in childbirth, there are halakhic distinctions between three, seven, and thirty days after she gives birth. The Gemara elaborates: During the first three days after birth, whether she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, or whether she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one desecrates Shabbat for her. Between three and seven days after birth, if she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one desecrates Shabbat for her. If she did not say: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one does not desecrate Shabbat for her. Between seven and thirty days after birth, even if she said: I need Shabbat to be desecrated, one does not desecrate Shabbat for her; however, we perform all necessary prohibited labors by means of a gentile.
כִּדְרַב עוּלָּא בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַב עִילַּאי, דְּאָמַר: כׇּל צׇרְכֵי חוֹלֶה נַעֲשִׂין עַל יְדֵי אַרְמַאי בְּשַׁבָּת, וְכִדְרַב הַמְנוּנָא, דְּאָמַר רַב הַמְנוּנָא: דָּבָר שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ סַכָּנָה — אוֹמֵר לְגוֹי וְעוֹשֶׂה.
This ruling is in accordance with the statement of Rav Ulla, son of Rav Ilai, who said: All needs of a sick person whose life is not in danger are performed by means of a gentile on Shabbat. And this ruling is in accordance with the opinion of Rav Hamnuna, as Rav Hamnuna says: With regard to a matter in which there is no danger, but only potential illness, one says to the gentile to perform the act, and the gentile performs the act.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: לְחַיָּה שְׁלֹשִׁים יוֹם. לְמַאי הִלְכְתָא? אָמְרִי נְהַרְדָּעֵי: לִטְבִילָה.
Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: For a woman in childbirth, there is a halakha of thirty days. The Gemara asks: With regard to what halakha was this stated? The Sages of Neharde’a say: It was stated with regard to the halakha of immersion. A woman does not purify herself through ritual immersion within thirty days of giving birth because she is in a weakened state and susceptible to catching cold.
אָמַר רָבָא: לָא אֲמַרַן אֶלָּא שֶׁאֵין בַּעְלָהּ עִמָּהּ, אֲבָל בַּעְלָהּ עִמָּהּ — בַּעְלָהּ מְחַמְּמָה. כִּי הָא דִּבְרַתֵּיה דְּרַב חִסְדָּא טְבַלָה בְּגוֹ תְּלָתִין יוֹמִין שֶׁלֹּא בִּפְנֵי בַּעְלָהּ וְאִצְטְנִיאַת, וְאַמְטְיוּהָא לְעַרְסַהּ בָּתְרֵיהּ דְּרָבָא לְפוּמְבְּדִיתָא.
Rava said: We say that the ruling that she does not immerse during that period applies only when her husband is not with her. However, if her husband is with her, her husband warms her by engaging in relations with her, and she is not susceptible to catching cold, as is illustrated in this incident involving the daughter of Rav Ḥisda, Rava’s wife. She immersed within thirty days of giving birth, not in the presence of her husband, and caught cold, and afterward they brought her funeral bier after Rava to Pumbedita.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: עוֹשִׂין מְדוּרָה לְחַיָּה בְּשַׁבָּת בִּימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים. סְבוּר מִינָּה לְחַיָּה — אִין, לַחוֹלֶה — לָא, בִּימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים — אִין, בִּימוֹת הַחַמָּה — לָא. וְלָא הִיא, לָא שְׁנָא חַיָּה וְלָא שְׁנָא חוֹלֶה, לָא שְׁנָא בִּימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים וְלָא שְׁנָא בִּימוֹת הַחַמָּה. מִדְּאִתְּמַר, אָמַר רַב חִיָּיא בַּר אָבִין אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: הִקִּיז דָּם וְנִצְטַנֵּן — עוֹשִׂין לוֹ מְדוּרָה אֲפִילּוּ בִּתְקוּפַת תַּמּוּז.
Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: One builds a fire for a woman in childbirth on Shabbat during the rainy season. The Sages thought to infer from here the following: For a woman in childbirth, yes, one builds a fire; for sick people, no, he does not build a fire. In the rainy season, yes, one builds a fire; in the summer, no, he does not build a fire. And the Gemara concludes: That is not the case. There is no difference between a woman in childbirth and a sick person, and there is no difference between the rainy season and the summer. In all of these cases one may build a fire on Shabbat. This conclusion emerges from that which was stated: Rav Ḥiyya bar Avin said that Shmuel said: With regard to one who let blood and caught cold, one makes a fire for him even during the season of Tammuz, i.e., the summer. Failure to do so could result in serious illness.
שְׁמוּאֵל צַלַּחוּ לֵיהּ תַּכְתָּקָא דְשָׁאגָא, רַב יְהוּדָה צַלַּחוּ לֵיהּ פָּתוּרָא דְיוֹנָה, לְרַבָּה צַלַּחוּ לֵיהּ שַׁרְשִׁיפָא.
The Gemara relates that after Shmuel underwent bloodletting, they broke for him a wooden armchair made of teak [shaga] to build a fire. Similarly, for the sake of Rav Yehuda they broke a wooden table made of ebony [yavna], and for Rabba they broke a bench. They needed to build a fire due to the potential danger to Rabba. Since they could not find firewood, they kindled the fire with the furniture.
וַאֲמַר לֵיהּ אַבָּיֵי לְרַבָּה: וְהָא קָעָבַר מָר מִשּׁוּם ״בַּל תַּשְׁחִית״! אֲמַר לֵיהּ: ״בַּל תַּשְׁחִית״ דְּגוּפַאי עֲדִיף לִי.
And Abaye said to Rabba: In breaking the bench, didn’t the Master violate the prohibition, “Do not destroy” (Deuteronomy 20:19)? It is prohibited to destroy objects of value. Rabba said to him: Do not destroy also with regard to destruction of my body. Preventing illness and danger is preferable to me.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: לְעוֹלָם יִמְכּוֹר אָדָם קוֹרוֹת בֵּיתוֹ וְיִקַּח מִנְעָלִים לְרַגְלָיו. הִקִּיז דָּם וְאֵין לוֹ מַה יֹּאכַל — יִמְכּוֹר מִנְעָלִים שֶׁבְּרַגְלָיו וְיַסְפִּיק מֵהֶן צׇרְכֵי סְעוּדָה.
With regard to the danger of bloodletting, the Gemara cites that which Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: One should always sell the beams of his house and purchase shoes for his feet with the proceeds, as shoes protect him from stepping on obstacles and from catching cold. If he let blood and has nothing to eat after the bloodletting, he should even sell the shoes on his feet, and from the proceeds provide the needs of a meal. After bloodletting, a meal is more crucial to one’s well-being than shoes are.
מַאי צׇרְכֵי סְעוּדָה? רַב אָמַר: בָּשָׂר, וּשְׁמוּאֵל אָמַר: יַיִן. רַב אָמַר: בָּשָׂר — נַפְשָׁא חֲלַף נַפְשָׁא. וּשְׁמוּאֵל אָמַר: יַיִן — סוּמָּקָא חֲלַף סוּמָּקָא.
The Gemara asks: What are these special needs of a meal? Rav said: It is referring to meat. And Shmuel said: It is referring to wine. The Gemara explains: Rav says: It is referring to meat because the soul replaces the soul, i.e., the meat replenishes the person’s strength. And Shmuel said: It is referring to wine because the red replaces the red, i.e., red wine substitutes for red blood.
(סִימָן ״שֶׁנִּמְסַר״).
A mnemonic for the names of the Sages cited in the following discussion is the word shenimsar; shin for Shmuel, nun for Rabbi Yoḥanan, mem for Rav Naḥman, samekh for Rav Yosef, reish for Rava.
שְׁמוּאֵל בְּיוֹמָא דַּעֲבַד מִילְּתָא, עָבְדִי לֵיהּ תַּבְשִׁילָא דִטְחָלֵי. רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן שָׁתֵי עַד דְּנָפֵיק תִּיהְיָא מֵאוּנֵּיהּ. וְרַב נַחְמָן שָׁתֵי עַד דְּקָפֵי טְחָלֵיהּ. רַב יוֹסֵף שָׁתֵי עַד דְּנָפֵיק מֵרִיבְדָּא דְכוּסִילְתָּא. רָבָא מְהַדַּר אַחַמְרָא בַּר תְּלָתָא טַרְפֵי.
The Gemara relates the following about bloodletting and drinking wine. Shmuel, on the day on which he would perform the practice of bloodletting, they would prepare for him a dish of cooked spleen. Rabbi Yoḥanan would drink wine after bloodletting until the odor emerged from his ears. And Rav Naḥman would drink until his spleen floated in wine. Rav Yosef would drink until the wine would emerge from the bloodletting incision. Rava would search for wine that was sufficiently aged such that three leaves had already grown over three years on the vine from which the grapes were picked (Rashash).
אֲמַר לְהוּ רַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק לְרַבָּנַן: בְּמָטוּתָא מִינַּיְיכוּ, בְּיוֹמָא דְהַקָּזָה אֱמַרוּ לְבֵיתַיְיכוּ: נַחְמָן אִקְּלַע לְגַבַּן.
Rav Naḥman bar Yitzhak said to the Sages: I beg of you, on the day that you undergo bloodletting, tell your households, your wives: Naḥman bar Yitzhak happened to come to visit us. Due to the visit of the important guest, the women will prepare a large meal. The husbands will eat well, recover from the lost blood, and avoid endangering themselves.
וְכוּלְּהוּ אִעָרוֹמֵי אֲסִירִי, בַּר מֵהַאי עׇרְמָה דִּשְׁרֵי: מַאן דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא וְלָא אֶפְשָׁר לֵיהּ, לִישְׁקוֹל זוּזָא מָכָא וְלֵיזִיל לְשַׁב חַנְוָאתָא, עַד דְּטָעֵים שִׁיעוּר רְבִיעֲתָא. וְאִי לָא — לֵיכוֹל שַׁב תַּמְרֵי אוּכָּמָתָא, וְלֵישׁוּף מִישְׁחָא בְּצִידְעֵיהּ, וְנִיגְנֵי בְּשִׁמְשָׁא.
And Rav Naḥman bar Yitzhak said: All types of artifice that come at the expense of others are prohibited except for this artifice, which is permitted. One who performed the practice of bloodletting and it is not possible for him to purchase food due to lack of means, let him take a worn zuz coin and go to seven stores. In each store, he tastes the wine as one who seeks to buy wine would. After tasting, he hands the zuz to the storekeeper, who will not accept it because it is worn. He then proceeds to do the same in all the stores until he has tasted the measure of a quarter of a log of wine. And if doing so is not possible, let him eat seven black dates and smear oil on his temple and lie in the sun.
אַבְלֵט אַשְׁכְּחֵיהּ לִשְׁמוּאֵל דְּגָנֵי בְּשִׁמְשָׁא. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: חַכִּימָא דִיהוּדָאֵי, בִּישָׁא מִי הָוֵי טָבָא?! אֲמַר לֵיהּ: יוֹמָא דְהַקָּזָה הוּא.
The Gemara relates: The gentile scholar, Ablat, found Shmuel lying in the sun. Ablat said to Shmuel: Wise man of the Jews, a matter that is evil, can it become good? Are there any circumstances in which the heat of the sun, which is harmful, can be beneficial? Shmuel said to him: It happens on a day of bloodletting, for which the heat of the sun is beneficial.
וְלָא הִיא, אֶלָּא אִיכָּא יוֹמָא דִּמְעַלֵּי בֵּהּ שִׁמְשָׁא בְּכוּלַּהּ שַׁתָּא — יוֹמָא דְּנָפְלָה בֵּיהּ תְּקוּפַת תַּמּוּז. וְסָבַר: לָא אֱיגַלֵּי לֵיהּ.
The Gemara comments: And actually, that is not what occurred. Rather, there is a day on which the sun is beneficial more than the entire year, and that is the day on which the Tammuz solstice, the longest day of the year, occurs. And Shmuel thought: I will not reveal this remedy to him.
(הֵיקֵיל בְּרוּחַ טַעְמָא שָׁהָה — סִימָן) רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: כׇּל הַמַּקֵּיל בִּסְעוּדַת הַקָּזַת דָּם — מְקִילִּין לוֹ מְזוֹנוֹתָיו מִן הַשָּׁמַיִם, וְאוֹמְרִים: הוּא עַל חַיָּיו לֹא חָס, אֲנִי אָחוּס עָלָיו?!
Indifferent, in wind, taste, waited are a mnemonic for the following matters. It was Rav and Shmuel who both said: Anyone who is indifferent and not vigilant with regard to the meal eaten after bloodletting, they are indifferent with regard to providing his food from the Heavens. And they say in the name of Heaven: He took no pity on his life, will I take pity on him?
רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: הַאי מַאן דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא — לָא לִיתִּיב הֵיכָא דִּכְרִיךְ זִיקָא, דִּילְמָא שָׁפֵי לֵיהּ אוּמָּנָא וּמוֹקֵים לֵיהּ אַרְבִיעֵתָא, וְאָתֵי זִיקָא וְשָׁאֵיף מִינֵּיהּ, וְאָתֵי לִידֵי סַכָּנָה.
Similarly, it was Rav and Shmuel who both said: One who performs the practice of bloodletting should not sit where the wind is blowing, due to the concern that perhaps the blood letter let too much blood from him and established the amount of remaining blood at a quarter of a log. And there is concern the wind will come and draw out a little more blood from him, and he will be endangered.
שְׁמוּאֵל הֲוָה רְגִיל דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא בְּבֵיתָא דְּשַׁב לִבְנֵי וְאַרְחָא. יוֹמָא חֲדָא עֲבַד, וְאַרְגִּישׁ בְּנַפְשֵׁיהּ. בְּדַק וַחֲסַר חַד אַרְחָא.
The Gemara relates: Shmuel would customarily perform the practice of bloodletting in a house whose walls were seven and a half bricks thick. One day he performed bloodletting and felt himself weakened. He examined and discovered that one half-brick was lacking from the thickness of the walls. The resultant chill caused his weakness.
רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: הַאי מַאן דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא — לִיטְעוֹם מִידֵּי וַהֲדַר לִיפּוֹק. דְּאִי לָא טָעֵים מִידֵּי, אִי פָּגַע בְּשָׁכְבָא — יָרְקִי אַפֵּיהּ. אִי פָּגַע בְּמַאן דְּקָטֵל נַפְשָׁא — מָיֵת. אִי פָּגַע
It was Rav and Shmuel who both said: One who performs the practice of bloodletting should taste something and then go outside, since if he does not taste anything, if he encounters a corpse, his face will turn green. If he encounters one who killed a person, he will die. If he encounters
בְּדָבָר אַחֵר — קָשֶׁה לְדָבָר אַחֵר.
something else, a euphemism for a pig, it is harmful with regard to something else, a euphemism for leprosy.
רַב וּשְׁמוּאֵל דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: הַאי מַאן דְּעָבֵיד מִילְּתָא — לִישְׁהֵי פּוּרְתָּא וַהֲדַר לֵיקוּם — דְּאָמַר מָר: חֲמִשָּׁה דְּבָרִים קְרוֹבִין לְמִיתָה יוֹתֵר מִן הַחַיִּים, וְאֵלּוּ הֵן: אָכַל וְעָמַד, שָׁתָה וְעָמַד, יָשֵׁן וְעָמַד, הִקִּיז דָּם וְעָמַד, שִׁימֵּשׁ מִטָּתוֹ וְעָמַד.
It was Rav and Shmuel who both said: With regard to one who performs the practice of bloodletting, let him wait a bit and then let him rise, as the Master said: There are five matters that render one closer to death than life, and they are these: If one ate and immediately rose, if one drank and rose, if one slept and immediately rose, if one let blood and rose, if one engaged in conjugal relations and rose.
אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: פּוּרְסָא דִדְמָא — כׇּל תְּלָתִין יוֹמִין. וּבֵין הַפְּרָקִים — יְמַעֵט, וּבֵין הַפְּרָקִים יַחְזוֹר וִימַעֵט.
Shmuel said: The interval for bloodletting is every thirty days. And during the middle periods of one’s life, he should decrease the frequency of bloodletting; and during the later periods, he should decrease its frequency again.
וְאָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: פּוּרְסָא דִדְמָא — חַד בְּשַׁבְּתָא, אַרְבָּעָה, וּמַעֲלֵי שַׁבְּתָא, אֲבָל שֵׁנִי וַחֲמִישִׁי — לָא. דְּאָמַר מָר: מִי שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ זְכוּת אָבוֹת יַקִּיז דָּם בְּשֵׁנִי וּבַחֲמִישִׁי, שֶׁבֵּית דִּין שֶׁל מַעְלָה וְשֶׁל מַטָּה שָׁוִין כְּאֶחָד.
And Shmuel said: The times for bloodletting are the first day of the week, the fourth day of the week and Shabbat eve. However, on the second and the fifth days of the week, no, one should not let blood, as the Master said: Only one who has the merit of his ancestors and relies on it should let blood on the second and on the fifth days of the week, as the court on High, in the heavens, and the court below are equal. The courts in the cities convene on Mondays and Thursdays, as does the heavenly court. Letting blood on a day of judgment is dangerous. If one is judged unfavorably all his blood could flow out.
בִּתְלָתָא בְּשַׁבְּתָא מַאי טַעְמָא לָא? מִשּׁוּם דְּקָיְימָא לֵיהּ מַאְדִּים בְּזָוֵוי. מַעֲלֵי שַׁבְּתָא נָמֵי קָיְימָא בְּזָוֵוי! כֵּיוָן דְּדָשׁוּ בֵּיהּ רַבִּים — ״שׁוֹמֵר פְּתָאִים ה׳״.
The Gemara explains: On the third day of the week, what is the reason that one does not let blood? It is because the planet Mars is dominant during the even hours. Since it is a planet of blood, and the even hours are a bad omen, that combination gives cause for concern. The Gemara asks: On Shabbat eve, Mars also dominates during the even hours. The Gemara answers: Since the multitudes have already become accustomed to letting blood on Shabbat eve, the verse: “The Lord protects the simple-hearted” (Psalms 116:6) applies in this case.
אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אַרְבַּע דְּהוּא אַרְבַּע, אַרְבַּע דְּהוּא אַרְבֵּיסַר, אַרְבַּע דְּהוּא עֶשְׂרִים וְאַרְבְּעָה, אַרְבַּע דְּלֵיכָּא אַרְבַּע בָּתְרֵיהּ — סַכַּנְתָּא.
Similarly, Shmuel says: On the fourth day of the week that is the fourth day of the month; on the fourth day of the week that is the fourteenth of the month; on the fourth day of the week that is the twenty-fourth of the month; and on the fourth day of the week after which there are not four days remaining in the month it is dangerous to let blood.
רֹאשׁ חוֹדֶשׁ וְשֵׁנִי לוֹ — חוּלְשָׁא. שְׁלִישִׁי לוֹ — סַכָּנָה. מַעֲלֵי יוֹמָא טָבָא — חוּלְשָׁא. מַעֲלֵי יוֹמָא דַעֲצַרְתָּא — סַכַּנְתָּא. וּגְזַרוּ רַבָּנַן אַכּוּלְּהוּ מַעֲלֵי יוֹמָא טָבָא מִשּׁוּם יוֹמָא (טָבָא) דַעֲצַרְתָּא, דְּנָפֵיק בֵּיהּ זִיקָא וּשְׁמֵיהּ ״טָבוֹחַ״, דְּאִי לָא קַבִּלוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל תּוֹרָה — הֲוָה טָבַח לְהוּ לְבִשְׂרַיְיהוּ וְלִדְמַיְיהוּ.
Bloodletting on the New Moon and on the second day of the month causes weakness; bloodletting on the third day of the month leads to danger. Bloodletting on the eve of a Festival causes weakness; bloodletting on the eve of the festival of Shavuot leads to danger. And the Sages issued a decree prohibiting bloodletting on the eve of every Festival due to the festival of Shavuot. On Shavuot, an evil spirit named Tibbuaḥ, from the Hebrew word meaning slaughter, emerges, as had the Jewish people not accepted the Torah on the festival of Shavuot, Tibbuaḥ would have slaughtered their flesh and their blood. Consequently, it remains a dangerous day.
אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אָכַל חִטָּה וְהִקִּיז דָּם — לֹא הִקִּיז אֶלָּא לְאוֹתָהּ חִטָּה. וְהָנֵי מִילֵּי לִרְפוּאָה, אֲבָל אַקּוֹלֵי — מֵיקֵיל.
Shmuel said: If one ate wheat and afterward let blood, he only let that wheat. The bloodletting was ineffective as the wheat replaced any blood that was let. And this ineffectiveness applies only if he let blood to cure an illness; however, to relieve discomfort, bloodletting after eating wheat relieves one’s discomfort.
הַמַּקִּיז דָּם, שְׁתִיָּיה — לְאַלְתַּר. אֲכִילָה — עַד חֲצִי מִיל.
One who lets blood should engage in drinking immediately; he should not engage in eating until the time that it takes to walk half a mil has elapsed.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: שְׁתִיָּיה לְאַלְתַּר מְעַלֵּי, אֲבָל בָּתַר הָכִי קָשֵׁי, אוֹ דִילְמָא לָא קָשֵׁי וְלָא מְעַלֵּי? תֵּיקוּ.
A dilemma was raised before the Sages: When they said that one should engage in drinking immediately, does that mean that drinking immediately is beneficial; however, thereafter, it is injurious? Or perhaps, thereafter it is neither injurious nor beneficial. No resolution is found for this dilemma, therefore it stands unresolved.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: אֲכִילָה עַד חֲצִי מִיל הוּא דְּקָמְעַלֵּי, הָא בָּתַר הָכִי וּמִקַּמֵּי הָכִי — קָשֵׁי, אוֹ דִילְמָא לָא קָשֵׁי וְלָא מְעַלֵּי? תֵּיקוּ.
Similarly, a dilemma was raised before the Sages: When they said one should not engage in eating until the time that it takes to walk half a mil has elapsed, does that mean that only at that time it is beneficial, however, after that time or before that time it is injurious? Or perhaps, before and after that time it is neither injurious nor beneficial. No resolution is found for this dilemma, therefore it too stands unresolved.
מַכְרִיז רַב: מֵאָה קַרֵי בְּזוּזָא, מֵאָה רֵישֵׁי בְּזוּזָא, מֵאָה שְׂפָמֵי וְלָא כְלוּם. אָמַר רַב יוֹסֵף: כִּי הֲוֵינַן בֵּי רַב הוּנָא, יוֹמָא דִּמְפַגְּרִי בֵּיהּ רַבָּנַן, אָמְרִי: הָאִידָּנָא יוֹמָא דִשְׂפָמֵי הוּא, וְלָא יָדַעְנָא מַאי קָאָמְרִי.
Rav would announce: One hundred bloodlettings for a zuz; cutting the hair on one hundred heads for a zuz; grooming one hundred moustaches does not cost anything (ge’onim). Blood letters typically served as barbers as well and did not charge for grooming a moustache. If one hundred men happened to arrive one day to have their moustaches groomed, the barber would work all day without receiving any pay. Rav Yosef said: When we were students in Rav Huna’s school, on a day when the Sages were sluggish in their studies, they would say: Today is the day of the moustaches, and I did not know what they were saying. Now that I heard Rav’s statement, I understand that they meant that it was a day without purpose.
וְקוֹשְׁרִין הַטַּבּוּר. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: קוֹשְׁרִין הַטַּבּוּר. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר: אַף חוֹתְכִין. וְטוֹמְנִין הַשִּׁלְיָא כְּדֵי שֶׁיֵּחַם הַוָּלָד. אָמַר רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל: בְּנוֹת מְלָכִים — טוֹמְנוֹת בִּסְפָלִים שֶׁל שֶׁמֶן, בְּנוֹת עֲשִׁירִים — בִּסְפוֹגִים שֶׁל צֶמֶר, בְּנוֹת עֲנִיִּים בְּמוֹכִין.
We learned in the mishna: And one may tie the umbilical cord of a child born on Shabbat. The Sages taught similarly in the Tosefta and even added to it: One may tie the umbilical cord of a child born on Shabbat. Rabbi Yosei said: One may even cut the umbilical cord. And one may insulate the placenta as a healing remedy so as to warm the newborn. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel said: Princesses insulate the placenta in mugs of oil; the daughters of the wealthy do so in combed wool; the daughters of the poor in soft rags.
אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר אֲבוּהּ אָמַר רַב: הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי יוֹסֵי.
Rav Naḥman said that Rabba bar Avuh said that Rav said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yosei that it is even permitted to cut the umbilical cord on Shabbat.
וְאָמַר רַב נַחְמָן אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר אֲבוּהּ אָמַר רַב: מוֹדִים חֲכָמִים לְרַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּטַבּוּר שֶׁל שְׁנֵי תִינוֹקוֹת, שֶׁחוֹתְכִין. מַאי טַעְמָא? דִּמְנַתְּחִי אַהֲדָדֵי.
And Rav Naḥman said that Rabba bar Avuh said that Rav said: The Rabbis concede to Rabbi Yosei with regard to the umbilical cord attached to twin babies that one may cut it on Shabbat. What is the reason for this? In that case, leaving the cord attached is dangerous. Since the attached twins will try to disengage from each other, they could potentially rip each other’s cords.
וְאָמַר רַב נַחְמָן אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר אֲבוּהּ אָמַר רַב: כׇּל הָאָמוּר בְּפָרָשַׁת תּוֹכָחָה עוֹשִׂין לְחַיָּה בְּשַׁבָּת. שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וּמוֹלְדוֹתַיִךְ בְּיוֹם הוּלֶּדֶת אוֹתָךְ לֹא כׇרַּת שׇׁרֵּךְ וּבְמַיִם לֹא רֻחַצְתְּ לְמִשְׁעִי וְהׇמְלֵחַ לֹא הֻמְלַחַתְּ וְהׇחְתֵּל לֹא חֻתָּלְתְּ״.
And Rav Naḥman said that Rabba bar Avuh said that Rav said: Everything stated in the passage of rebuke (Ezekiel 16) one may perform for a woman in childbirth on Shabbat. Since that chapter speaks of the dangerous birth of an abandoned child, for all other children, these issues should be addressed. As it is stated there: “And as for your birth, on the day you were born, your navel was not cut, and you were not washed in water for cleansing, and you were not salted, nor were you swaddled” (Ezekiel 16:4).
״וּמוֹלְדוֹתַיִךְ בְּיוֹם הוּלֶּדֶת״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁמְיַילְּדִים אֶת הַוָּלָד בְּשַׁבָּת. ״לֹא כׇרַּת שׇׁרֵּךְ״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁחוֹתְכִין הַטַּבּוּר בְּשַׁבָּת. ״וּבְמַיִם לֹא רֻחַצְתְּ לְמִשְׁעִי״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁרוֹחֲצִין הַוָּלָד בְּשַׁבָּת. ״וְהׇמְלֵחַ לֹא הֻמְלַחַתְּ״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁמּוֹלְחִין הַוָּלָד בְּשַׁבָּת. ״וְהׇחְתֵּל לֹא חֻתָּלְתְּ״ — מִכָּאן שֶׁמְּלַפְּפִין הַוָּלָד בְּשַׁבָּת.
The Gemara explains: “And as for your birth, on the day you were born”; from here it is derived that one delivers the newborn on Shabbat. “Your navel was not cut”; from here it is derived that one cuts the umbilical cord on Shabbat. “And you were not washed in water for cleansing”; from here it is derived that one washes the newborn on Shabbat. “And you were not salted”; from here it is derived that one salts the newborn on Shabbat. “Nor were you swaddled”; from here it is derived that one swaddles the newborn on Shabbat.
הדרן עלך מפנין
