מועד קטן כז

מועד קטן כז

אִם יָכוֹל לְמַעֵט בְּעִסְקוֹ — יְמַעֵט, וְאִם לָאו — יְגַלְגֵּל עִמָּהֶן.

if he can reduce his business, he should reduce it; and if not, he may carry on with them, i.e., his business partners. He may act in partnership with the members of the group with which he is traveling, but he may not engage in business independently.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: מֵאֵימָתַי כּוֹפִין אֶת הַמִּטּוֹת — מִשֶּׁיֵּצֵא מִפֶּתַח בֵּיתוֹ, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר. רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ אוֹמֵר: מִשֶּׁיִּסָּתֵם הַגּוֹלֵל.

§ The Sages taught the following baraita: From when do the mourners overturn their beds? From when the corpse is taken out of the opening of his house; this is the statement of Rabbi Eliezer. Rabbi Yehoshua says: From when the tomb is sealed with the grave cover.

מַעֲשֶׂה שֶׁמֵּת רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל הַזָּקֵן, כֵּיוָן שֶׁיָּצָא מִפֶּתַח בֵּיתוֹ אָמַר לָהֶם רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר: כְּפוּ מִטּוֹתֵיכֶם. וְכֵיוָן שֶׁנִּסְתַּם הַגּוֹלֵל, אָמַר לָהֶם רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ: כְּפוּ מִטּוֹתֵיכֶם. אָמְרוּ לוֹ: כְּבָר כָּפִינוּ עַל פִּי זָקֵן.

There was an incident in which the Nasi Rabban Gamliel the Elder died, and once his body left the opening of his house, Rabbi Eliezer said to the members of the household: Overturn your beds. And once the tomb was sealed with the grave cover, Rabbi Yehoshua said to them: Overturn your beds. They then said to him: We already overturned them in accordance with the Elder, i.e., Rabbi Eliezer.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: מֵאֵימָתַי זוֹקְפִין אֶת הַמִּטּוֹת בְּעֶרֶב שַׁבָּת — מִן הַמִּנְחָה וּלְמַעְלָה. אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר הוּנָא: אַף עַל פִּי כֵן אֵינוֹ יוֹשֵׁב עָלֶיהָ עַד שֶׁתֶּחְשַׁךְ. וּלְמוֹצָאֵי שַׁבָּת, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵין לוֹ לֵישֵׁב אֶלָּא יוֹם אֶחָד — חוֹזֵר וְכוֹפֶה.

The Sages taught in a baraita: From when do the mourners stand their beds upright on Friday; as the rites of mourning are not observed on Shabbat, and the beds must be returned to their ordinary position beforehand? From minḥa time onward. Rabba bar Huna said: Even so, one may not sit down on his upright bed immediately. Rather, he must wait until it becomes dark to do so. And at the conclusion of Shabbat, even if he has only one more day to sit in mourning, i.e., his period of mourning concludes on Sunday, he must once again overturn his bed.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הַכּוֹפֶה מִטָּתוֹ, לֹא מִטָּתוֹ בִּלְבַד הוּא כּוֹפֶה, אֶלָּא כׇּל מִטּוֹת שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ בְּתוֹךְ בֵּיתוֹ הוּא כּוֹפֶה. וַאֲפִילּוּ יֵשׁ לוֹ עֶשֶׂר מִטּוֹת בַּעֲשָׂרָה מְקוֹמוֹת — כּוֹפֶה אֶת כּוּלָּן. וַאֲפִילּוּ חֲמִשָּׁה אַחִין וּמֵת אֶחָד — כּוּלָּן כּוֹפִין.

The Sages taught in a baraita: With regard to one who is in mourning and must overturn his bed, he overturns not only his own bed, but rather he overturns all the beds he has in his house. And even if he has ten beds in ten different places, he overturns them all. And even if there are five brothers and one of them died, all of them overturn their beds wherever they live.

וְאִם הָיְתָה מִטָּה הַמְיוּחֶדֶת לְכֵלִים — אֵין צָרִיךְ לִכְפּוֹתָהּ. דַּרְגֵּשׁ — אֵין צָרִיךְ לִכְפּוֹתוֹ, אֶלָּא זוֹקְפוֹ. רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר: דַּרְגֵּשׁ מַתִּיר אֶת קַרְבִּיטָיו וְהוּא נוֹפֵל מֵאֵילָיו.

If, however, it is a bed designated for the storage of garments and not for sleeping, he is not required to overturn it. It is also not necessary to overturn a dargash, but rather he stands it upright. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says: With regard to a dargash, one loosens its loops [karbitav], which hold up the pillows, and it falls on its own.

מַאי דַּרְגֵּשׁ? אָמַר עוּלָּא: עַרְסָא דְגַדָּא.

The Gemara asks: What is the meaning of the word dargash? Ulla said: It is a good-luck [gada] bed, as it was common to have ornamental beds for good luck, which were not used for sleeping.

אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַבָּה: אֶלָּא מֵעַתָּה גַּבֵּי מֶלֶךְ, דִּתְנַן: כׇּל הָעָם מְסוּבִּים עַל הָאָרֶץ, וְהוּא מֵיסֵב עַל הַדַּרְגֵּשׁ. מִי אִיכָּא מִידֵּי דְּעַד הָאִידָּנָא לָא אוֹתְבִינֵּיהּ, וְהַשְׁתָּא מוֹתְבִינַן לֵיהּ?

Rabba said to him: However, if that is so, then the following statement with regard to a king is difficult, as we learned in a mishna (Sanhedrin 20a): When the mourner’s meal is served to the king and his family, all the people recline on the ground, and he, the king, due to his honor, reclines on a dargash. Is there anything upon which we would not have seated him until now, when he was not a mourner, but now, specifically during the mourning period, we seat him on it?

מַתְקֵיף לַהּ רַב אָשֵׁי: מַאי קוּשְׁיָא? מִידֵּי דְּהָוֵה אַאֲכִילָה וּשְׁתִיָּה, דְּעַד הָאִידָּנָא לָא אוֹכְלִינֵּיהּ וְלָא אַשְׁקִינֵּיהּ, הַשְׁתָּא אוֹכְלִינֵּיהּ וְאַשְׁקִינֵּיהּ!

Rav Ashi strongly objects to this: What is the difficulty raised by Rabba? One can answer: The halakha is just as it is in the case of eating and drinking, that until now, before one became a mourner, we did not feed him or give him drink, but now that he is a mourner we feed him and give him drink during the first meal after the burial.

אֶלָּא, אִי קַשְׁיָא — הָא קַשְׁיָא, דִּתְנַן: דַּרְגֵּשׁ אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לִכְפּוֹתוֹ אֶלָּא זוֹקְפוֹ. וְאִי עַרְסָא דְגַדָּא, אַמַּאי אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לִכְפּוֹתוֹ? הָא תְּנַן: הַכּוֹפֶה מִטָּתוֹ, לֹא מִטָּתוֹ בִּלְבַד הוּא כּוֹפֶה, אֶלָּא כׇּל מִטּוֹת שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ בְּתוֹךְ בֵּיתוֹ כּוֹפֶה!

Rather, if it is difficult, this is difficult, as we learned in a baraita: It is not necessary to overturn a dargash, but rather he stands it upright. But if it is a good-luck bed, why is it not necessary to overturn it? Didn’t we learn: One who is in mourning and must overturn his bed overturns not only his own bed, but rather he overturns all the beds in his house, including this good luck bed?

וּמַאי קַשְׁיָא? מִידֵּי דְּהָוֵה אַמִּטָּה הַמְיוּחֶדֶת לְכֵלִים. דְּתַנְיָא: אִם הָיְתָה מִטָּה הַמְיוּחֶדֶת לְכֵלִים — אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לִכְפּוֹתָהּ.

The Gemara rejects this: And what is difficult in this? One can answer: The halakha is just as it is in the case of a bed designated for the storage of garments, as it is taught in a baraita: If it is a bed designated for the storage of garments, and not for sleeping, one is not required to overturn it. So too, one is not required to overturn a dargash, as it is a bed that is not used for sleeping.

אֶלָּא, אִי קַשְׁיָא הָא קַשְׁיָא: רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר: דַּרְגֵּשׁ, מַתִּיר קַרְבִּיטָיו וְהוּא נוֹפֵל מֵאֵילָיו. וְאִי סָלְקָא דַעְתָּךְ עַרְסָא דְגַדָּא, מַאי קַרְבִּיטִין אִית לֵיהּ?

Rather if it is difficult, this is the difficulty: It was taught in a baraita: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says: With regard to a dargash, one loosens the loops that hold up the pillows, and it falls on its own. And if it enters your mind to say that a dargash is a good-luck bed, it is like other beds, so what loops does it have?

כִּי אֲתָא רָבִין אֲמַר לֵיהּ הָהוּא מֵרַבָּנַן, וְרַב תַּחְלִיפָא בַּר מַעְרְבָא שְׁמֵיהּ, דַּהֲוָה שְׁכִיחַ בְּשׁוּקָא דְגִילְדָּאֵי: מַאי דַּרְגֵּשׁ — עַרְסָא דְצַלָּא.

When Ravin came from Eretz Yisrael to Babylonia, one of the Sages, whose name was Rav Taḥalifa from the West, and who was frequently found in the market of leather workers, said to him: What is a dargash? It is a leather bed.

אִיתְּמַר נָמֵי, אָמַר רַבִּי יִרְמְיָה: דַּרְגֵּשׁ — סֵירוּגוֹ מִתּוֹכוֹ, מִטָּה — סֵירוּגָהּ עַל גַּבָּהּ.

It was also stated that Rabbi Yirmeya said: A dargash has its interlacing from the inside, i.e., attached to loops that go through holes that are made in the bed frame itself; whereas a bed has its interlacing from the outside, i.e., the strapping itself is looped around the wood of the frame, and therefore it cannot be loosened.

אָמַר רַבִּי יַעֲקֹב בַּר אַחָא אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ בֶּן לֵוִי: הֲלָכָה כְּרַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל. אִיתְּמַר נָמֵי, אָמַר רַבִּי יַעֲקֹב בַּר אַחָא אָמַר רַבִּי אַסִּי: מִטָּה שֶׁנַּקְלִיטֶיהָ יוֹצְאִין — זוֹקְפָהּ וְדַיּוֹ.

Rabbi Ya’akov bar Aḥa said in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel with regard to a dargash. It was also stated that Rabbi Ya’akov bar Aḥa said in the name of Rabbi Asi: A bed whose posts [naklitin] extend, meaning that they are very long so that the bed will remain high off the ground even if it is overturned, may be stood upright and that is sufficient. That is to say, one is not required to overturn such a bed.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: יָשֵׁן עַל גַּבֵּי כִּסֵּא, עַל גַּבֵּי אוּדְיָינִי גְּדוֹלָה, עַל גַּבֵּי קַרְקַע — לֹא יָצָא יְדֵי חוֹבָתוֹ. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: שֶׁלֹּא קִיֵּים כְּפִיַּית הַמִּטָּה.

The Sages taught the following baraita: If the mourner sleeps on a chair, or on a large overturned mortar, or on the ground, he does not fulfill his obligation, even though he is uncomfortable while sleeping. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: This is because he did not fulfill the mitzva of overturning the bed.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: מְכַבְּדִין וּמַרְבִּיצִין בְּבֵית הָאֵבֶל, וּמְדִיחִין קְעָרוֹת וְכוֹסוֹת וּצְלוֹחִיּוֹת וְקִיתוֹנִיּוֹת בְּבֵית הָאֵבֶל. וְאֵין מְבִיאִין אֶת הַמּוּגְמָר וְאֶת הַבְּשָׂמִים לְבֵית הָאֵבֶל.

The Sages taught another baraita: One may sweep and sprinkle water on a dirt floor in the house of a mourner, and one may wash bowls, cups, jugs, and pitchers in the house of a mourner. But one may not bring incense or fragrant spices into the house of a mourner.

אִינִי? וְהָא תָּנֵי בַּר קַפָּרָא: אֵין מְבָרְכִין לֹא עַל הַמּוּגְמָר וְלֹא עַל הַבְּשָׂמִים בְּבֵית הָאֵבֶל. בָּרוֹכֵי הוּא דְּלָא מְבָרְכִין, הָא אֵתוֹיֵי — מַיְיתִינַן!

The Gemara asks: Is that so? But doesn’t bar Kappara teach the following baraita: One may not recite a blessing either over incense or over fragrant spices in the house of a mourner? From this one may infer that one may not recite a blessing over these incense or spices, but one may bring them into the house of the mourner. This appears to contradict the previous baraita.

לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָא — בְּבֵית הָאֵבֶל, הָא — בְּבֵית הַמְנַחֲמִין.

The Gemara explains: It is not difficult. Here, the baraita is referring to the house of a mourner, into which spices should not be taken; there, the baraita that states that one may not recite a blessing over them, is referring to the house of the consolers, his relatives, into which spices may be brought.

מַתְנִי׳ אֵין מוֹלִיכִין לְבֵית הָאֵבֶל, לֹא בְּטַבְלָא, וְלֹא בְּאִסְקוּטְלָא, וְלֹא בְּקָנוֹן, אֶלָּא בְּסַלִּים. וְאֵין אוֹמְרִים בִּרְכַּת אֲבֵלִים בַּמּוֹעֵד, אֲבָל עוֹמְדִין בְּשׁוּרָה וּמְנַחֲמִין, וּפוֹטְרִין אֶת הָרַבִּים.

MISHNA: One does not bring the first meal after the burial to the house of mourning on a small tray [tavla], in a bowl [iskutla], or in a narrow-mouthed basket [kanon], but rather in ordinary baskets. And the mourners’ blessing is not recited on the intermediate days of a Festival, but the consolers may stand in a row when the mourners leave the cemetery and console them. And the mourners dismiss the many consolers, by telling them that they may return home after they have fulfilled the mitzva of consoling the mourners.

אֵין מַנִּיחִין אֶת הַמִּטָּה בָּרְחוֹב, שֶׁלֹּא לְהַרְגִּיל אֶת הַהֶסְפֵּד. וְלֹא שֶׁל נָשִׁים לְעוֹלָם, מִפְּנֵי הַכָּבוֹד.

The bier of the deceased is not set down in the street during the intermediate days of a Festival so as not to encourage eulogies. On an ordinary weekday, people would gather in the street around the bier to eulogize the deceased, but this should be avoided during the intermediate days of the Festival. And the biers of women are never set down, even if it is not the intermediate days of a Festival, due to their honor. Blood might drip from their bodies, and it would cause them dishonor if their blood stained the street.

גְּמָ׳ תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיוּ מוֹלִיכִין בְּבֵית הָאֵבֶל, עֲשִׁירִים — בִּקְלָתוֹת שֶׁל כֶּסֶף וְשֶׁל זָהָב, וַעֲנִיִּים — בְּסַלֵּי נְצָרִים שֶׁל עֲרָבָה קְלוּפָה, וְהָיוּ עֲנִיִּים מִתְבַּיְּישִׁים. הִתְקִינוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ הַכֹּל מְבִיאִין בְּסַלֵּי נְצָרִים שֶׁל עֲרָבָה קְלוּפָה, מִפְּנֵי כְּבוֹדָן שֶׁל עֲנִיִּים.

GEMARA: The Sages taught the following baraita: At first, the meal after the burial would be brought to the house of the mourner in various ways. The wealthy would bring the meal in baskets of silver and gold, and the poor would bring it in baskets of peeled willow branches. And the poor were embarrassed, as everyone would see that they were poor. The Sages instituted that everyone should bring the meal in baskets of peeled willow branches, due to the honor of the poor.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיוּ מַשְׁקִין בְּבֵית הָאֵבֶל, עֲשִׁירִים — בִּזְכוּכִית לְבָנָה, וַעֲנִיִּים — בִּזְכוּכִית צְבוּעָה, וְהָיוּ עֲנִיִּים מִתְבַּיְּישִׁין. הִתְקִינוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ הַכֹּל מַשְׁקִין בִּזְכוּכִית צְבוּעָה, מִפְּנֵי כְּבוֹדָן שֶׁל עֲנִיִּים.

The Sages taught a similar baraita: At first, they would serve wine in the house of the mourner during the first meal after the burial; the wealthy would do so in cups made from white glass, and the poor would serve this wine in cups of colored glass. And the poor were embarrassed, as everyone would see that they were poor. The Sages instituted that all should serve drinks in the house of the mourner in colored glass cups, due to the honor of the poor.

בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיוּ מְגַלִּין פְּנֵי עֲשִׁירִים וּמְכַסִּין פְּנֵי עֲנִיִּים, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהָיוּ מוּשְׁחָרִין פְּנֵיהֶן מִפְּנֵי בַצּוֹרֶת, וְהָיוּ עֲנִיִּים מִתְבַּיְּישִׁין. הִתְקִינוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ מְכַסִּין פְּנֵי הַכֹּל, מִפְּנֵי כְּבוֹדָן שֶׁל עֲנִיִּים.

Furthermore, at first they would uncover the faces of the wealthy who passed away and cover the faces of the poor, because their faces were blackened by famine. And the poor were embarrassed because they were buried in a different manner. The Sages instituted that everyone’s face should be covered, due to the honor of the poor.

בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיוּ מוֹצִיאִין עֲשִׁירִים בְּדַרְגֵּשׁ, וַעֲנִיִּים

Additionally, at first the wealthy would take the deceased out for burial on a dargash, and the poor would take the deceased out

בִּכְלִיכָה, וְהָיוּ עֲנִיִּים מִתְבַּיְּישִׁין. הִתְקִינוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ הַכֹּל מוֹצִיאִין בִּכְלִיכָה, מִפְּנֵי כְּבוֹדָן שֶׁל עֲנִיִּים.

on a plain bier made from poles that were strapped together, and the poor were embarrassed. The Sages instituted that everyone should be taken out for burial on a plain bier, due to the honor of the poor.

בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיוּ מַנִּיחִין אֶת הַמּוּגְמָר תַּחַת חוֹלֵי מֵעַיִם מֵתִים, וְהָיוּ חוֹלֵי מֵעַיִם חַיִּים מִתְבַּיְּישִׁין. הִתְקִינוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ מַנִּיחִין תַּחַת הַכֹּל, מִפְּנֵי כְּבוֹדָן שֶׁל חוֹלֵי מֵעַיִם חַיִּים.

Similarly, at first they would place incense under the beds of those who died with an intestinal disease, because the body emitted an especially unpleasant odor. And those who were alive with an intestinal disease were embarrassed when they understood that they, too, would be treated in this manner after their death, and that everyone would know the cause of their death. The Sages instituted that incense should be placed under everyone, due to the honor of those with an intestinal disease who were still living.

בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיוּ מַטְבִּילִין אֶת הַכֵּלִים עַל גַּבֵּי נִדּוֹת מֵתוֹת, וְהָיוּ נִדּוֹת חַיּוֹת מִתְבַּיְּישׁוֹת. הִתְקִינוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ מַטְבִּילִין עַל גַּבֵּי כׇּל הַנָּשִׁים, מִפְּנֵי כְּבוֹדָן שֶׁל נִדּוֹת חַיּוֹת. בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה מַטְבִּילִין עַל גַּבֵּי זָבִין מֵתִים, וְהָיוּ זָבִין חַיִּים מִתְבַּיְּישִׁין. הִתְקִינוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ מַטְבִּילִין עַל גַּב הַכֹּל, מִפְּנֵי כְּבוֹדָן שֶׁל זָבִין חַיִּים.

Moreover, at first they would ritually immerse all the utensils that had been used by women who died while menstruating, which had thereby contracted ritual impurity. And due to this, the living menstruating women were embarrassed. The Sages instituted that the utensils that had been used by all dying women must be immersed, due to the honor of living menstruating women. And, at first they would ritually immerse all the utensils that had been used by zavin, men suffering from gonorrhea, who died, as the utensils had thereby contracted ritual impurity. And due to this the living zavin felt embarrassed. The Sages instituted that the utensils that had been used by all men must be immersed, due to the honor of the living zavin.

בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיְתָה הוֹצָאַת הַמֵּת קָשָׁה לִקְרוֹבָיו יוֹתֵר מִמִּיתָתוֹ, עַד שֶׁהָיוּ קְרוֹבָיו מַנִּיחִין אוֹתוֹ וּבוֹרְחִין. עַד שֶׁבָּא רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל וְנָהַג קַלּוּת רֹאשׁ בְּעַצְמוֹ, וְיָצָא בִּכְלֵי פִשְׁתָּן, וְנָהֲגוּ הָעָם אַחֲרָיו לָצֵאת בִּכְלֵי פִשְׁתָּן. אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: וְהָאִידָּנָא נְהוּג עָלְמָא אֲפִילּוּ בְּצַרְדָּא בַּר זוּזָא.

Likewise, at first taking the dead out for burial was more difficult for the relatives than the actual death, because it was customary to bury the dead in expensive shrouds, which the poor could not afford. The problem grew to the point that relatives would sometimes abandon the corpse and run away. This lasted until Rabban Gamliel came and acted with frivolity, meaning that he waived his dignity, by leaving instructions that he be taken out for burial in linen garments. And the people adopted this practice after him and had themselves taken out for burial in linen garments. Rav Pappa said: And nowadays, everyone follows the practice of taking out the dead for burial even in plain hemp garments [tzerada] that cost only a dinar.

אֵין מַנִּיחִין אֶת הַמִּטָּה בָּרְחוֹב. אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: אֵין מוֹעֵד בִּפְנֵי תַּלְמִיד חָכָם, וְכׇל שֶׁכֵּן חֲנוּכָּה וּפוּרִים.

It is taught in the mishna: The bier of the deceased is not set down in the street during the intermediate days of a Festival, so as not to encourage eulogies. Rav Pappa said: There are no restrictions on eulogizing on the intermediate days of a Festival in the presence of a deceased Torah scholar, and therefore he may be eulogized in the ordinary manner during the Festival week. And all the more so a Torah scholar may be eulogized on the days of Hanukkah and Purim, which have less sanctity than the intermediate days of a Festival.

וְהָנֵי מִילֵּי בְּפָנָיו, אֲבָל שֶׁלֹּא בְּפָנָיו — לָא. אִינִי?! וְהָא רַב כָּהֲנָא סַפְדֵיהּ לְרַב זְבִיד מִנְּהַרְדְּעָא בְּפוּם נַהֲרָא! אָמַר רַב פַּפֵּי: יוֹם שְׁמוּעָה הֲוָה, וְכִבְפָנָיו דָּמֵי.

The Gemara comments: But this allowance to eulogize a Torah scholar during the intermediate days of a Festival applies only when the eulogy is in the presence of the deceased, before the bier. However, giving a eulogy that is not in his presence is not permitted. The Gemara asks: Is that so? But didn’t Rav Kahana eulogize Rav Zevid from Neharde’a in his city Pum Nahara during the intermediate days of a Festival? Rav Pappa said: It was the day on which Rav Kahana received the news of Rav Zevid’s death, and a eulogy in such a situation is considered as if it is in his presence.

אָמַר עוּלָּא: הֶסְפֵּד עַל לֵב, דִּכְתִיב: ״עַל שָׁדַיִם סוֹפְדִים״. טִיפּוּחַ בַּיָּד. קִילּוּס בָּרֶגֶל.

The Gemara continues its discussion of the halakhot of mourning: Ulla said: Although hesped usually refers to a eulogy, strictly speaking, hesped is referring to striking oneself on the heart, as it is written: “Striking [sofedim] the breasts” (Isaiah 32:12). The term tipuaḥ is referring to striking with one hand against the other hand, i.e., clapping. The term killus is referring to stomping with one’s foot on the ground.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הַמְקַלֵּס — לֹא יְקַלֵּס בְּסַנְדָּל, אֶלָּא בְּמִנְעָל, מִפְּנֵי הַסַּכָּנָה.

The Sages taught a baraita: One who stomps his foot on the ground as a sign of mourning should not stomp with a sandal, but rather he should do so wearing a shoe, due to the danger of being hurt. Because a sandal is easily torn, it is possible that something sharp on the ground will puncture his foot, or that he will suffer some other injury.

אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: אָבֵל, כֵּיוָן שֶׁנִּיעְנַע רֹאשׁוֹ — שׁוּב אֵין מְנַחֲמִין רַשָּׁאִין לֵישֵׁב אֶצְלוֹ.

Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Once a mourner nods his head to show that his grief has slightly diminished, the consolers may no longer sit next to him, as with his action the mourner shows that he no longer desires their presence.

וְאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: הַכֹּל חַיָּיבִין לַעֲמוֹד מִפְּנֵי נָשִׂיא, חוּץ מֵאָבֵל וְחוֹלֶה. וְאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: לַכֹּל אוֹמְרִים לָהֶם ״שֵׁבוּ״, חוּץ מֵאָבֵל וְחוֹלֶה.

Rabbi Yoḥanan further said: All are obligated to stand in the presence of the Nasi, except for a mourner and one who is sick. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: To all who stand before a great person one says: Be seated, and only then may they sit down, except for a mourner and one who is sick. If they stood up they do not need permission to sit down, but rather they may do so if they wish.

אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: אָבֵל, יוֹם רִאשׁוֹן אָסוּר לֶאֱכוֹל לֶחֶם מִשֶּׁלּוֹ, מִדַּאֲמַר לֵיהּ רַחֲמָנָא לִיחֶזְקֵאל: ״וְלֶחֶם אֲנָשִׁים לֹא תֹאכֵל״. רַבָּה וְרַב יוֹסֵף מְחַלְּפִי סְעוֹדָתַיְיהוּ לַהֲדָדֵי.

Rav Yehuda said in the name of Rav: A mourner on the first day of his mourning is prohibited from eating of his own bread. From where is this derived? From what the Merciful One says to Ezekiel when the latter is in mourning: “Nor eat the bread of men” (Ezekiel 24:17), which indicates that other mourners must eat bread made by others. It was related that when Rabba and Rav Yosef were in mourning they would exchange their meals with each other.

וְאָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: מֵת בְּעִיר — כׇּל בְּנֵי הָעִיר אֲסוּרִין בַּעֲשִׂיַּית מְלָאכָה.

And Rav Yehuda said in the name of Rav: When a person dies in a city, all of the residents of that city are prohibited from performing work until he has been buried.

רַב הַמְנוּנָא אִיקְּלַע לְדֵרוּ מָתָא, שְׁמַע קוֹל שִׁיפּוּרָא דְשָׁכְבָא. חֲזָא הָנָךְ אִינָשֵׁי דְּקָא עָבְדִי עֲבִידְתָּא, אֲמַר לְהוּ: לֶיהְווֹ הָנָךְ אִינָשֵׁי בְּשַׁמְתָּא. לָא שָׁכְבָא אִיכָּא בְּמָתָא?! אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ: חֲבוּרָתָא אִיכָּא בְּמָתָא. אֲמַר לְהוּ: אִי הָכִי, שַׁרְיָא לְכוּ.

The Gemara relates that when Rav Hamnuna once happened to come to a place called Darumata he heard the sound of a shofar announcing that a person had died in the town. When he saw some people doing work he said to them: Let these people be under an excommunication. Is there not a dead person in town? They said to him: There are separate groups in the town, each one responsible for its own dead. Knowing that the deceased was not from our group, we continued our work. He said to them: If so, it is permitted to you, and he revoked his excommunication.

וְאָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: כׇּל הַמִּתְקַשֶּׁה עַל מֵתוֹ יוֹתֵר מִדַּאי, עַל מֵת אַחֵר הוּא בּוֹכֶה. הָהִיא אִיתְּתָא דַּהֲוָת בְּשִׁיבָבוּתֵיהּ דְּרַב הוּנָא, הֲווֹ לַהּ שִׁבְעָה בְּנֵי, מִית חַד מִינַּיְיהוּ, הֲווֹת קָא בָּכְיָא בִּיתִירֻתָא עֲלֵיהּ. שְׁלַח לַהּ רַב הוּנָא: לָא תַּעַבְדִי הָכִי! לָא אַשְׁגְּחָה בֵּיהּ. שְׁלַח לַהּ: אִי צָיְיתַתְּ — מוּטָב, וְאִי לָא — צְבִית זְוַודְתָּא לְאִידַּךְ מִית, וּמִיתוּ כּוּלְּהוּ. לְסוֹף אֲמַר לַהּ: תִּימוּשׁ זְוַודְתָּא לְנַפְשִׁיךְ, וּמִיתָא.

And Rav Yehuda said further in the name of Rav: Anyone who grieves excessively over his dead and does not allow himself to be consoled will in the end weep for another person. The Gemara relates that a certain woman who lived in the neighborhood of Rav Huna had seven sons. One of them died and she wept for him excessively. Rav Huna sent a message to her: Do not do this. But she took no heed of him. He then sent another message to her: If you listen to me, it is well, but if not, prepare shrouds for another death. But she would not listen and they all died. In the end, when she continued with her excessive mourning, he said to her: Since you are acting in this way, prepare shrouds for yourself, and soon thereafter she died.

״אַל תִּבְכּוּ לְמֵת וְאַל תָּנוּדוּ לוֹ״. ״אַל תׇּבְכּוּ לְמֵת״ — יוֹתֵר מִדַּאי, ״וְאַל תָּנוּדוּ לוֹ״ — יוֹתֵר מִכְּשִׁיעוּר. הָא כֵּיצַד? שְׁלֹשָׁה יָמִים לְבֶכִי, וְשִׁבְעָה לְהֶסְפֵּד, וּשְׁלֹשִׁים לְגִיהוּץ וּלְתִסְפּוֹרֶת. מִכָּאן וְאֵילָךְ — אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא: אִי אַתֶּם רַחְמָנִים בּוֹ יוֹתֵר מִמֶּנִּי.

The Sages taught in a baraita with regard to the verse that states: “Weep not for the dead, neither bemoan him” (Jeremiah 22:10): “Weep not for the dead” is referring to excessive mourning; “neither bemoan him” more than the appropriate measure of time. How so? What is the appropriate measure? Three days for weeping, and seven for eulogizing, and thirty for the prohibition against ironing clothing and for the prohibition against cutting hair. From this point forward the Holy One, Blessed be He, says: Do not be more merciful with the deceased than I am. If the Torah commands one to mourn for a certain period of time, then that suffices.

״בְּכוּ בָכוֹ לַהוֹלֵךְ״, אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: לַהוֹלֵךְ בְּלֹא בָּנִים. רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ בֶּן לֵוִי לָא אֲזַל לְבֵי אִבְלָא אֶלָּא לְמַאן דְּאָזֵיל בְּלָא בְּנֵי, דִּכְתִיב: ״בְּכוּ בָכוֹ לַהוֹלֵךְ כִּי לֹא יָשׁוּב עוֹד וְרָאָה אֶת אֶרֶץ מוֹלַדְתּוֹ״. רַב הוּנָא אָמַר: זֶה שֶׁעָבַר עֲבֵירָה וְשָׁנָה בָּהּ.

It is stated in the continuation of the verse: “Weep sore for him that goes away.” Rav Yehuda said: This is referring to one who leaves the world without children to survive him, since mourning for him is much more intense. It was related that Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi would go to a house of mourning only for one who passed away without children, as it is written: “Weep sore for him that goes away; for he shall return [yashuv] no more, nor see his native land” (Jeremiah 22:10). Rav Huna disagreed with the interpretation of the verse and said: “Him that goes” is one who committed a transgression and then repeated it, i.e., one who sins constantly and does not repent [yashav], and therefore loses his portion in the World-to-Come, his “native land.”

רַב הוּנָא לְטַעְמֵיהּ, דְּאָמַר רַב הוּנָא: כֵּיוָן שֶׁעָבַר אָדָם עֲבֵירָה וְשָׁנָה בָּהּ — הוּתְּרָה לוֹ. הוּתְּרָה לוֹ סָלְקָא דַּעְתָּךְ?! אֶלָּא אֵימָא: נַעֲשֵׂית לוֹ כְּהֶיתֵּר.

The Gemara notes that Rav Huna conforms to his standard line of reasoning, as Rav Huna said: Once a person commits a transgression and repeats it, it becomes permitted to him. The Gemara questions the wording used here: Does it enter your mind that it is actually permitted? How could it possibly be permitted for him to sin? Rather, say instead: It becomes as though it were permitted, for after doing it twice he no longer relates to his action as the violation of a serious prohibition.

אָמַר רַבִּי לֵוִי: אָבֵל, שְׁלֹשָׁה יָמִים הָרִאשׁוֹנִים יִרְאֶה אֶת עַצְמוֹ כְּאִילּוּ חֶרֶב מוּנַּחַת לוֹ בֵּין שְׁתֵּי יַרְיכוֹתָיו. מִשְּׁלֹשָׁה עַד שִׁבְעָה — כְּאִילּוּ מוּנַּחַת לוֹ כְּנֶגְדּוֹ בְּקֶרֶן זָוִית, מִכָּאן וְאֵילָךְ — כְּאִילּוּ עוֹבֶרֶת כְּנֶגְדּוֹ בַּשּׁוּק.

Rabbi Levi said: A mourner during the first three days of his mourning should see himself as though a sword were lying between his two thighs, meaning that he too may be facing imminent death. During this period he should live in dread. From the third to the seventh days he should conduct himself as if the sword were lying opposite him in the corner, but still threatening him. From this point forward it is as if the sword was moving before him in the marketplace, and the fear is not as great.

וְלֹא שֶׁל נָשִׁים לְעוֹלָם מִפְּנֵי הַכָּבוֹד. אָמְרִי נְהַרְדָּעֵי: לֹא שָׁנוּ

§ The mishna teaches: And the biers of women are never set down, due to their honor. The Sages of Neharde’a say: They only taught this